No Suffering, No
Service: Proper
24, Year B
Job 38:1-7, 34-41; Isaiah
53:4-12; Psalm 104:1-9, 24, 35c;
Psalm
91:9-16; Hebrews 5:1-10; Mark 10:35-45
The Elves are determined that
we should concentrate on redemptive
suffering, brought about by obedience to the overwhelming power of
God. But Job is not about to be redeemed as a result of his
suffering. Nor is Jesus, despite the overwhelming weight of 2,000
years of orthodox Christology, bolstered by proof-texts from Isaiah and
the letter to the Hebrews.
To designate the reading from Isaiah “alternative,” which the RCL does,
implies that it is not intended to complement the reading from
Job. Indeed, the instructions for the use of the Lectionary make
clear that the alternative is provided for the discretion of worship
leaders to consider the needs of local congregations. “The RCL
does not provide one set [of Old Testament readings] as more favored
than the other, but the use of the two patterns should not be mixed”
(RCL, Abingdon Press, 1992, p. 11). These commentaries have
challenged that recommendation from the beginning. In the case of
Proper 24, the readings from Job and from Isaiah 53 provide both a foil
for the reading from Hebrews, and perhaps a counter to the emerging
apocalypticism in Mark’s theology.
The Elves leave out the third (and final) warning that Mark’s Jesus
relates about his impending death and resurrection (Mark
10:32-34). This is unfortunate, because it illustrates
another of
Mark’s favorite story-telling devices: three times is the charm.
Right before this declaration, as discussed last week, Mark’s Jesus
repeats the lesson first told in 9:35 that the last shall be first, and
the first shall be last. But the lesson goes unheeded by the
disciples. Instead of walking with Jesus as equals on the path,
they once again let Jesus lead the Way. He tells them (for the
third time) that they are going to Jerusalem, where “the son of Adam
will be turned over to the ranking priests and the scholars, and they
will sentence him to death, and turn him over to foreigners, and they
will . . .put him to death. Yet after three days he will rise!”
James and John immediately go for the gold: “In your glory,” they
say, with no thought about what happens before the “glory,” “Let one of
us sit at your right hand, and the other at your left.” The Sons
of Zebedee are out of luck, but not because of some mysterious
predestination hinted at by Mark’s Jesus (“sitting at my right or my
left, that’s not mine to grant, but belongs to those for whom it has
been reserved”). Making Jesus able to foretell the future is a
fun touch, but Mark knew when he wrote the story that Jesus’s brother
James had been martyred by Herod Agrippa some years after Jesus’s death
(Acts 12:2).
Jesus tells them that they have no idea what they
are asking. Right after this incident, in 10:47-45, when the
other disciples get annoyed with the Zebedee power play, Jesus
says for the third (and last) time, “whoever wants to become great must
be your servant, and whoever wants to be ‘number one’ must be
everybody’s slave.” Then to make the point perfectly clear,
“After all, the son of Adam didn’t come to be served, but to serve,
even to give his life as a ransom for many.”
Mark is beating us over the head with his conviction about who Jesus
was, and what his message meant. But the Elves, like the
dim-witted disciples in Mark’s story, continue to ignore it. They
pile on the complicated theology of the writer of the letter to the
Hebrews, who maintains that Jesus was made perfect because of his
suffering. As an alternative, they call our attention to Isaiah’s
third epic poem about the suffering servant of God, which Christendom
since Paul has believed refers to Jesus. They further obscure the
point with references to Job’s suffering at the hands of God. Given the
careful selectivity with which they choose what we are and are not to
read, the Elves seem to want us to think that Job’s and Jesus’s
suffering were God’s Will.
The portion lifted from the story of Job for Proper 24 concentrates on
part of God’s Answer. We do not read that God challenges Job to
respond, nor do we read Job’s response. God thunders God’s power,
and challenges Job with impossible questions (which we also do not
read): Do you know when the mountain goats give birth? Do you give the
horse its might? Is it by your wisdom that the hawk soars? Is it
at your command that the eagle mounts up? And ultimately, “Shall
a faultfinder contend with the Almighty? Anyone who argues with
God must respond.” Job is rendered speechless. If we had
read the interlude, which tells us where true wisdom can be found, we
would know why: God holds all the cards. God alone knows
the way to wisdom. God then starts a second round, even though
Job has conceded defeat.
I propose that there is no connection between the story of Job and
Mark’s story of Jesus. As a bet between God and one of his
lieutenants, Job suffered the loss of everything. Despite that,
he maintained his own integrity. Job does not repudiate his own
righteousness. At the end of his defense Job says, “If my land
has cried out against me, and its furrows have wept together; if I have
eaten its yield without payment, and caused the death of its owners;
let thorns grow instead of wheat, and foul weeds instead of barley”
(31:38-40)
At the end of the story, Job’s life and fortunes are restored.
Three times, Mark’s Jesus says that he is destined (by
God) to suffer and die. “The cup I’m drinking, you’ll be
drinking” (10:29). Then in 10:45, Mark spells out his conviction
that Jesus came to serve as a sacrifice – a ransom – for the sin of
many. Then, according to Mark’s theology, on the third day Jesus
will rise as the apocalyptic Son of Adam, and usher in the
Kingdom.
The story of Job challenged conventional ideas about the
retributive justice of God, that if you suffer it is because of your
sin. In the end, Job realizes that God is God, and that God’s
justice has nothing to do with reward and punishment. Only God
knows the wisdom and the ways of God. Mark’s story of Jesus opens
the wisdom and the ways of God to everyone. In 21st Century
language, the way to God’s realm – God’s wisdom – is
through the radical abandonment of self-interest in the service of
distributive justice-compassion. That service is what brings
suffering and death to the one called by God to act on behalf of
distributive justice-compassion. That one often ends up on the
wrong side of society’s laws.
Throughout all the readings, regardless of the reason for or the
results derived from suffering, runs a common theme of
non-violence. Job does not “curse God and die,” as recommended by
his wife (2:9). His “patience” – or endurance – in the face of
calamity are proverbial. The writer of Hebrews compares the
Christ called by God to be High Priest and mediator with a “high priest
chosen from among mortals.” The high priest “is able to deal
gently with the ignorant and wayward, since he himself is subject to
weakness.” The servant described by Isaiah “was oppressed and
afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; . . . They made his grave
with the wicked and his tomb with the rich, although he had done no
violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth.” Mark’s Jesus
says, “You know how those who supposedly rule over foreigners lord it
over them, and how their strong men tyrannize them. It’s not
going to be like that with you! With you, whoever wants to become
great must be your servant, and whoever among you wants to be number
one must be everybody’s slave.”
Neither Job’s nor Mark’s story is about redemptive suffering nor –
heaven forfend – substitutionary atonement. Both stories
challenge the easy piety defined by the normal systems of human
society: an eye for an eye; the wealthy and healthy are blessed by God;
the end justifies the means.
BLOG ARCHIVE